In a POSSE world, everybody owns a domain name, and everybody has a blog.
Posts marcados com “livros”
Minha dieta cultural na última semana #5
EsquinasMinha dieta cultural na última semana #4
EsquinasMinha dieta cultural na última semana #3
EsquinasMinha dieta cultural na última semana #2
EsquinasMinha dieta cultural na última semana
EsquinasMinha dieta cultural de janeiro
Esquinas↪ Her
NotasAnotações: solidão, comunidade, internet como uma vizinhança
Notas↪ Advertisers Don’t Want Sites Like Jezebel to Exist
Notas↪ 'Killers Of The Flower Moon' Asks You To Sit With Its Contradictions | Defector
NotasPerdido no meio de A Balada do Café Triste há uma dissertação sobre o amor:
↪ Lunchbox Poems
Notas“I always have a book next to wherever I put my phone,” Escoto tells me. “So if I have the urge to check my phone for another useless doomscrolling session, I physically can see the book there. Nine times out of 10, I will choose the book, because I know what’s in store for me if I get on my phone.”
You’ll never become a reader by wishing you read more, listening exclusively to podcasts, or sitting next to a book while you scroll Instagram. (Even buying books doesn’t make you a reader, as I have, unfortunately, found out.)
Some studies have suggested that reading fiction can increase empathy. But a perhaps even more surprising finding comes from researchers who discovered a short-term decrease in the need for “cognitive closure” in the minds of readers of fiction. In brief, the researchers write, those with a high need for cognitive closure “need to reach a quick conclusion in decision-making and an aversion to ambiguity and confusion,” and thus, when confronted with confusing circumstances, tend to seize on fast explanations and hang on to them. That generally means they’re more susceptible to things like conspiracy theories and poor information, and they become less rational in their thinking. Reading fiction, though, studies have found, tends to retrain the brain to stay open, comfortable with ambiguity, and able to sort through information more carefully.
The vague but ominous disruption promised by artificial intelligence fogs this process, justifying where it needs to justify and serving as a sort of jeering threat everywhere else; that this AI doesn’t yet really do anything well, and has the unfortunate habit of eating its own excrement until it goes insane, has not really damped this cohort’s enthusiasm for it. Which fits, because that appeal is more ideological and aspirational than practical. What all of these businesses—creative industries, social media platforms, online commerce—have in common is that they need people. They need people to make them, and they need other people to pay attention to them. The super-class that sits atop all this, gloating, does not like that very much.

Ótima a comparação que Jennifer Egan faz da internet com o conto de João e Maria: a casa de doces é “de graça”, mas quanto mais você come, mais chances você tem de ser devorado.
“To be alone for any length of time is to shed an outer skin. The body is inhabited in a different way when we are alone than when we are with others. Alone, we live in our bodies as a question rather than a statement.”